Comments for James Allen

Comment on IBM WebSphere MQ – [MSG]: Encountered a JMS error – MQJMS2005: failed to create MQQueueManager for ” by James J Allen

James J Allen — Thu, 24 May 2012 18:10:19 +0000

A good technote from the IBM MQ team on MQ Series errors and likely causes:
http://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21265188

Comment on IBM DB2 STMM by James J Allen

James J Allen — Mon, 14 May 2012 19:43:08 +0000

Note: By default the” Database Memory” setting is set to ‘Automatic’ for the STMM. It should not be limited to a fixed value

Comment on The U.S. of A! by JC

JC — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:07:37 +0000

james = jim

Comment on IoD2011: Best Practices for High Volume Intake and in IBM FileNet CM – Bill Carpenter by Carol Mitchell

Carol Mitchell — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:59:40 +0000

We have this issue of tuning, retry, tuning, retry.

Ingesting very high volume into FileNet P8 4.5.1 and content queue gets backed up. Not high enough performance.

Using Oracle DB with webshere.

Do you offer any consulting assistance?

If yes, contact me at carol.mitchell@cm-mitchell.com.

Comment on WAS & disabling LTPA tokens by Joseph Rose

Joseph Rose — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:39:59 +0000

For anyone running either an AE/CE, WXT/CE or eDM/CE on separate servers, there needs to be an LTPA handshake for this to work.
A bug exists on WAS 6.1 prior to 6.1.035 where the LTPA cache can ‘fill up’ and housekeeping is not performed properly. This can result in one or more WAS clones running out of ‘heap’ memory (available memory).
In theory, LTPA key expiry is a bit like SSL key expiry and needs to be managed. Automating the generation of keys certainly removes this burden but might contravene your organisation’s security policy.

Comment on Dear Santa….. by James J Allen

James J Allen — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:56:15 +0000

PS: Dont forget the Go Pro as well

Comment on ICC & Transparent Retrieval by IoD2011: ICC Product Update – Dana Morris « James Allen

IoD2011: ICC Product Update – Dana Morris « James Allen — Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:55:23 +0000

[...] http://jamesjallen.me/2011/06/30/icc-transparent-retrieval/ [...]

Comment on The BPM Stool… by Mike Ciccarelli

Mike Ciccarelli — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:11:48 +0000

I agree – and would expand to say that there are also three legs to the people side. For a BPM deployment to be successful you need dedicated subject matter experts from the end user community, management buy in to support the cross-organizational change, and an experienced implementation team. The simple graphics get the point across well.

Comment on ICC & Transparent Retrieval by Thomas Andersen

Thomas Andersen — Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:27:02 +0000

Hi Dana

I have not opened a PMR yet but I planned to do it at some point.

I’ve seen this problem on Outlook 2007 and 2010.

Comment on ICC & Transparent Retrieval by Dana Morris

Dana Morris — Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:31:28 +0000

Thomas – have you opened a PMR with IBM support to look in to this as that’s the first I’ve heard of such a problem? I’m the product manager for IBM Content Collector (among other products). I’ll pass this along to my development team to see if they have encountered this issue.

What version of Outlook are you testing with and on what operating system?